Seismo Blog

Earthquakes happen on big cracks in the ground called faults.  There are all kinds of faults.  The biggest faults in the world are those on the edges of tectonic plates. Our local, giant fault is the Cascadia Subduction zone where the oceanic Juan de Fuca plate dives beneath the continental North American plate. Another large plate-boundary fault is the San Andreas Fault, where two plates slide past each other rather that moving towards each other like in Cascadia.

Smaller faults occur within tectonic plates where the Earth is stretched or compressed.  For example, if you take a bucket full of sand and push on the sides of the bucket, cracks will form in the sand.  These are miniature faults.  If you took the same bucket and pulled out on the sides, you would also get miniature faults.  Like a rubber band, the Earth can only be stretched so far before it breaks. The Seattle fault, which runs from Bainbridge Island, across the Puget Sound, and through West Seattle and Bellevue, is an example of a fault formed as a result of the Earth horizontally compressing.

USGS scientist Brian Sherrod provided the fault locations that we now show on the PNSN map.[1]  How did he and his colleagues find the faults? Sometimes you can see faults at the Earth’s surface.  Finding faults this way involves lots of fieldwork hiking around and looking for evidence of faulting. Another technique, called LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), involves shooting lasers at the ground to precisely measure surface elevation.  By looking at maps made with LiDAR, scientists can identify faults that are not immediately obvious out in the field.

PNSN recent event page with faults displayed. To display faults, go to the “Control Panel” and check the “Display Faults” box. The Cascadia Subduction zone and Seattle Fault are labeled here, but are not labeled on the actual map.

Unfortunately, both looking for faults in the field and LiDAR surveys have limitations.  Copious amounts of vegetation, such as we have in the Pacific Northwest, can cover up evidence of faulting. In addition, earthquakes often happen on faults that are buried underground and leave no expression at the surface. For example, the Nisqually earthquake in 2001 happened on a fault 30 miles deep. While we knew that Nisqually-type earthquakes had happened near there in the past, we did not know the location of the fault that the earthquake occurred on. Even now, we do not know the fault’s precise dimensions or where other similar faults are located in the region.

Image of a fault near Entiat, Washington. Here, scientists dug a 4-foot trench to look at the angle of the fault beneath the surface.  Only the most significant faults are trenched—this fault is a candidate for the fault that caused a large earthquake in 1872.  Photo courtesy of Brian Sherrod.

Another complication is that faults can look different at depth than they do on the surface.  A fault that looks like a single crack at depth might break up into multiple faults near the surface.  This is called a fault zone. In addition, faults can be tilted. Therefore the line drawn on the map from the surface expression may not represent where the fault is at depth.

Many of you are probably wondering why many of the earthquakes on the map do not lie on faults.  This is a direct result of the problems discussed above—our knowledge of faults beneath the earth’s surface, where earthquakes occur, is limited.  Plus, even if we knew where all the faults were, we still could not predict when each fault would produce an earthquake.

The new “Display Faults” tool is a great way for you to learn more about the geology of the Pacific Northwest, but before you start exploring the map, here are some final caveats:

1)   The faults shown are the ones we know about, and not all the faults that exist,

2)   Only the faults in Oregon and Washington are on the map, and

3)   Because the earthquake locations are only approximate and fault locations are sometimes uncertain, we do not want you to over interpret how close your house might be to a fault, or try too hard to identify earthquakes with specific faults. Therefore the faults do not show up when the map is the most zoomed-in.

Enjoy!



[1] Sherrod used several other fault compilations to help map the fault lines. These include the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold Database, maps by the Washington Geology and Earth Resources Division, and maps by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Mapping faults is difficult, and scientists often interpret where faults are differently. Therefore, don’t be surprised if these other fault maps look different than the one on the PNSN webpage.

 

Exotic Events (not erotic events)

April 1, 2016

by Steve Malone

Seismically recorded non-earthquakes now have their own page at the PNSN.

Negative depth earthquakes?

March 30, 2016

by Steve Malone

Why do some earthquakes in our list have negative depths now?

Explosion "Earthquakes"

March 10, 2016

by Steve Malone

Two recent large explosions generated acoustic waves recorded on seismographs.

West Coast Earthquake Early Warning System on the Horizon

February 9, 2016

by Shelley Chestler

Last week the White House hosted the first ever Earthquake Resilience Summit. One of the main goals of the meeting was to discuss the potential for fully funding a west coast earthquake early warning system.

Back-to-back ETS events, maybe

February 6, 2016

by Steve Malone

Following the recent "standard" northern Washington ETS another has apparently started heading south toward Oregon.

Slow Earthquake Trembles beneath Vancouver Island

January 7, 2016

by Shelley Chestler

Did you know that there is a type of earthquake that happens so slowly that we can’t feel it? One of these slow earthquakes is happening under Vancouver Island and northern Washington right now!

A Perspective on Tremor Activity

January 7, 2016

by Aaron Wech

With tremor activity occurring in the Pacific Northwest, it's important to provide perspective.

Don't Sweat the Little Ones

December 14, 2015

by Shelley Chestler

The recent earthquakes around the Puget Sound are probably not indicative of the “big one.”

A new look for pnsn.org

December 4, 2015

by Jon Connolly

The new pnsn.org website aims to provide a better user experience for all devices, prioritize features, and provide robust availability during a seismic event.
The July 2015 New Yorker article “The Really Big One,” by Kathryn Schulz, shook up the Pacific Northwest (PNW) more than any earthquake has since the Magnitude-6.8 Nisqually earthquake in 2001. In the article’s most dooming statement, the head of the Cascadia FEMA division was quoted saying, “everything west of I-5 will be toast.” This assertion scared the living daylights out of PNW residents, creating a sense of terror and hopelessness that was the antithesis of what the article meant to do: to spur the region into preparing for this potentially devastating event.

Unusual earthquake swarm south of Bend, OR

October 23, 2015

by Steve Malone

A somewhat unusual earthquake swarm started early on Oct 22, 2015 in an area about 65 km (40 miles) southwest of Bend, OR (25 km WSW of La Pine, OR). 36 events have been detected and located by the PNSN as of noon on Oct. 23, the largest only Magnitude 2.5. This ongoing swarm is in the same area that had similar swarms in 2001 and 2012 and is likely just the same sort of thing taking place again. For more details and updates....

How big was that earthquake?

September 24, 2015

by Steve Malone

Determining an earthquake's size seems to often result in different and inconsistent estimates. The "Magnitude" of an earthquake can be determined by several different methods, all of which should have some relationship to one another and, at least be consistent one earthquake to another. Unfortunately that's often not the case. PNSN seismologists spend lots of time estimating (measuring and calculating) earthquake magnitudes and end up discussing (arguing over) different techniques and complaining (whining) about inconsistencies and criticizing (belittling) certain results. Recently some effort is being made to try and refine (improve) our standard, routine ways of determining magnitude. We are starting to upgrade our published catalog with these "improved" magnitude estimates so you may see these estimates change from what was in the catalog before. Don't worry. The earthquakes have not changed, just our estimate of how big they are. For the gory details of how this is being done......

Summer rockfall time, yet again

August 21, 2015

by Steve Malone

With hot dry weather it is not surprising that the seismic records for volcano stations show lots of signals consistent with rockfall/avalanches and other exotic seismic events. In fact it is a bit of a surprise that we have not seen more and bigger such events this summer........ so far. Recent activity at Mount Rainier has included a debris flow (probably related to a jökulhlaup) and a moderate sized rockfall from high on the southwest side of the volcano. For some of the seismic details.....

Why earthquakes disappear

May 31, 2015

by Renate Hartog

Earthquakes have been appearing and disappearing from the U.S.G.S. webpages, this blog explains why.

PNW Earthquake Early Warning prototype goes live

February 18, 2015

by Steve Malone

Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) is now officially working for the Pacific Northwest (Washington and Oregon) in the same way it has in California for the past two years. It even got tested the first night in operations and worked...sort of. A workshop hosted by the PNSN at the University of Washington on Feb 17 introduced the topic and featured software to a group of about forty invited participants. For a few details on the workshop and the system's first live test......
The Seattle Seahawks' win over the Green Bay Packers in over time ended up so exciting that many of us serious scientists forgot to be serious and analyze the seismograms. Yikes! What a crazy ending. In fact, most of the game was seismically quiet (and disheartening for Seahawk fans), but the final half hour produced several seismic events that challenges the original "Beast Quake" for seismic supremacy. For our semi-scientific analysis......

Panther versus Seahawk Game Analysis

January 11, 2015

by Steve Malone

Both the PNSN experiment and the Seahawks were successful Saturday evening. Both got off to a slow start. The PNSN QuickShake display had several bad dropouts during the first half and at half-time the Seahawks were only ahead by four points. When working properly QuickShake provided us with "early Warning" of a successful play that would show up on TV a few seconds later. None of the signals compared to the size of those during the original "Beast Quake" of 2011 but some interesting patterns were seen. For more detailed analysis......
Last year the PNSN used the vibrations generated by enthusiastic Seahawk fans at CenturyLink Field to test instruments, data acquisition and web based displays. Some might say the seismic monitoring inspired fans to greater cheering resulting in the Seahawk's successful Super Bowl run. With new instruments recently acquired and improved data processing and display techniques developed we are again looking for somewhere to test them. With the Seahawks again in the playoffs with home field advantage why not watch/help them again? For the details.....

Canadian ETS morphing to Washington one?

November 18, 2014

by Steve Malone

Over two weeks of tremor in central Vancouver Island has been progressing southward. Though we don't know about the geodetic component we suspect that this represents a slip event that is propagating southward. Since a southern Vancouver Island-Northern Puget Sound ETS is due about now the question is will this current activity continue all the way to southern Puget Sound. For some details.....

Great ShakeOut, Great success!

October 16, 2014

by Angel Ling

Congratulations and thank you for your participation in the Great ShakeOut Earthquake Drill! Hopefully it gave you a great opportunity to practice "Drop, Cover and Hold on", and review and update emergency preparedness plans and kits/supplies. Thanks again to make the Pacific Northwest safer. Read more to see what the Great Washington ShakeOut looks like at the PNSN!

The Great ShakeOut 2014 is Tomorrow!

October 15, 2014

by Angel Ling

Tomorrow is the Great Washington Shake Out 2014! Please join us in the World's largest Earthquake Drill at 10:16 a.m. on October 16. Read more...

Three Cascadia ETS events in past month??

September 4, 2014

by Steve Malone

Since Aug 10 there have been three parts of the Cascadia subduction zone with extended periods of near continuous tectonic tremor. Typically if tremor continues in a zone for more than 10 days then the geodesists can easily see an accompanying slow-slip event coincident with it. While tremor in the three zones has not been exactly synchronous it is somewhat unusual for this much of Cascadia to "light up" this strongly all together. For some of the details....

Is Mount St. Helens seismicity increasing?

July 29, 2014

by Steve Malone

Looking at the "Quakes near volcanoes" plot today shows that 87 earthquakes have been recorded at Mount St. Helens over the past 30 days. This is way above the average for the past many years. Is this significant? Actually, no. Its called a sampling artifact that gives the impression of increased activity. For the details......
Several days of very warm weather has resulted in a couple of large snow avalanches at Mount St Helens but apparently no unusually large ones at other volcanoes. The seismic network at Mount St. Helens is particularly good at picking up the shaking due to large snow avalanches. Two such events on the afternoon of May 14 got our attention. For copies of seismograms and photos......